Devine Criticizes Fauci’s Senate Testimony, Cites Fifth Amendment Reliance
Miranda Devine criticizes Dr. Anthony Fauci's testimony before the Senate, stating his silence and reliance on the Fifth Amendment, despite having a presidential pardon, solidifies his negative portrayal regarding COVID-19.
New York, NY, July 29, 2026 —
Columnist Miranda Devine has voiced criticism regarding Dr. Anthony Fauci’s recent testimony before the Senate, focusing on his invocation of the Fifth Amendment.
Devine argued that Dr. Fauci’s decision to remain silent, particularly in the context of having received a presidential pardon, serves to reinforce a negative perception of his role concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. According to Devine, this approach to his testimony contributes to the ongoing narrative surrounding his actions and decisions during the public health crisis.
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals from being compelled to give testimony that could incriminate themselves. Devine’s commentary suggests that Dr. Fauci’s reliance on this constitutional right, especially after being granted a presidential pardon, is viewed by critics as indicative of further concerns or potential liabilities related to his handling of the pandemic response.
The specific details of Dr. Fauci’s testimony and the exact questions posed were not provided in the summary. The outcome of the Senate hearing and any subsequent actions or statements from Dr. Fauci or other officials were also not detailed.
Devine’s remarks highlight a segment of public discourse that remains critical of Dr. Fauci’s tenure as a leading figure in the nation’s COVID-19 response. The reliance on the Fifth Amendment, in her view, has further solidified existing negative portrayals rather than clarifying his position.
Story summarized from the original created by Miranda Devine on nypost.com, see more information here.
Media gallery
