New York Times Publishes 21st Century TV Show Ranking, Igniting Fan Debate
The New York Times has published its list of the top 100 TV shows from the 21st century so far, prompting discussion about which of the top 15 are favorites.

New York, NY, September 25, 2026 — The New York Times recently released its curated list of the top 100 television shows of the 21st century to date. The publication of this comprehensive ranking has sparked widespread discussion among viewers and critics regarding the selections, particularly concerning the shows featured within the top 15 positions.
The list, compiled by the newspaper’s critics, aims to identify and celebrate the most influential and acclaimed television programming from the year 2000 onwards. While the full list of 100 shows has been made public, attention has quickly focused on the uppermost echelon of the ranking. This has led to considerable online and public conversation as audiences share their personal favorites and debate the critical consensus presented by The New York Times.
Details regarding the specific methodology used by The New York Times in compiling the list, or the names of the critics involved in its creation, were not explicitly detailed in the available information. Furthermore, the exact titles of the shows that comprise the top 15, nor the specific points of contention or agreement arising from their placement, were not provided. However, the release has undeniably generated engagement, with many fans using the ranking as a prompt to discuss their own viewing preferences and to highlight shows they believe were overlooked or perhaps ranked too highly or too low.
The nature of such lists often invites subjective interpretation and passionate defense of beloved programs. The New York Times’ ranking serves as a focal point for these conversations, encouraging a broader dialogue about the evolution of television storytelling and production over the past two decades.
Story summarized from the original created by Google News on news.google.com, see more information here.